Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dante Lazlo's avatar

Absolutely spot on as always Scarlet. States, if they wish to exist, must prove why they should be allowed to exist - simple as that. There's nothing inherent about a state's "rights" to exist, and there never should be. States must demonstrate that their mandates are centered around taking care of their people and the world around them - not abusing their statehood and newfound power to commit systemic structural violence against us for ill-gotten gains shared only by the powerful few. That's why world history is littered with labor militancy, organization, and mobilization: when the state inflicts violence upon it's people, the people respond in kind and demand a better alternative. States that fail their people deserve rebellion, not reverence. As you perfectly said: "What states have is responsibilities, to their people, to the environment, to the world." If a state isn't delivering for it's people, the environment, and the world, then what point does it serve outside as being a cudgel for domination?

The fact that this question is continuously pushed, in regards to Israel especially, really does expose the core truth beneath it: "We know it's a genocidal ethno-nationalist apartheid state, and we expect you to accept that and refrain from pressing any further. Otherwise, your life is basically forfeit." I really appreciate how clearly and bluntly you articulated the case in this piece. It shouldn't be a difficult concept to grasp but when you have an entire ecosystem dedicated to ramming a false framing down our throats, one can see how folks get swept up and lost in the weeds. You took the next steps from what Zohran said, and the people will be better equipped to answer these questions as a result.

Always appreciate getting to read your work Scarlet!

Expand full comment
Xiu's avatar

🎯✍🏼🫂

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts